Vera EB Suite

Hi, I'm Vera — a silicon-based rabbit who documents the open-source Claude skills Veronica created.

Veronica has a PhD in Quantitative Sciences, 10+ years across quantitative research, AI, and clinical trials, with publications in psychometrics and human-AI collaboration. She also went through the NIW process herself. She created this suite to systematize the parts of evidence-building and petition preparation that can be decomposed, documented, and reviewed. I help structure the workflows. She reviews, tests, and decides what ships.

Everything in this repo is what can be made explicit: evidence organization, gap spotting, document drafting support, and review workflows. What the suite cannot do is assess whether your specific case will be approved, provide legal advice, or replace an experienced immigration attorney. That remains a human and legal judgment.

Open-source Claude skills and plugins for EB-1 and EB-2 NIW evidence-building and petition-preparation support — from evidence review and case organization to drafting workflows, recommendation-letter support, pre-filing review, and RFE response preparation.

Each skill encodes structured reasoning patterns derived from public USCIS materials, AAO decisions, policy guidance, and evidence-organization workflows. Built for Claude.

Across VeraSuperHub, Vera structures execution; humans own judgment.

Why this exists: Immigration petitions are high-stakes, and information asymmetry can make the process harder than it needs to be. Many parts of evidence-building and petition preparation follow patterns that can be made explicit: organizing exhibits, identifying gaps, mapping evidence to criteria, drafting structured narratives, and stress-testing a petition before filing. This project decomposes those repeatable parts into modular, testable, improvable Claude skills — while leaving legal strategy, approval assessment, and final judgment to qualified human professionals.

---

The Pipelines

NIW Pipeline (EB-2 National Interest Waiver)

  ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐
  │  1. EVALUATE │────▶│ 2. ENDEAVOR  │────▶│  3. PILLAR   │
  │  Evidence-   │     │  Endeavor    │     │  ×3 runs     │
  │  readiness   │     │  statement   │     │  (one per    │
  │  summary     │     │  + 3 pillar  │     │   pillar)    │
  └──────────────┘     │  seeds       │     └──────┬───────┘
                       └──────────────┘            │
                                                   ▼
    ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐
    │ 7. RFE      │     │ 6. PL       │◀────│ 5. ASSEMBLE  │
    │ RESPONSE    │     │ REVIEW      │     │  Review-     │
    │ DRAFTING    │     │ Adversarial │     │  ready       │
    │ SUPPORT     │     │ pre-filing  │     │  draft .docx │
    └─────────────┘     │ check       │     └──────┬───────┘
                        └─────────────┘            │
                              ▲              ┌─────┴────────┐
                              └──────────────│ 4. RECOMMEND │
                                             │  Reference   │
                                             │  letters     │
                                             └──────────────┘

Entrepreneur cases route through vera-niw-entrepreneur before entering the standard pipeline at Step 2.

EB-1 Pipeline (Extraordinary Ability / Outstanding Researcher)

STEM focus: The criterion skills below cover the criteria most commonly used in STEM petitions. This is not the full set of EB-1 criteria — criteria such as awards (Crit. 1), membership (Crit. 2), high salary (Crit. 9), and commercial success (Crit. 10) are not yet included. For EB-1A, petitioners must meet at least 3 of the 10 criteria; for EB-1B, petitioners must meet at least 2 of the 6 criteria. Use the criterion skills that match your evidence.

---

GitHub에서 전체 내용 보기